Criteria and Instructions to
2010 Colorado Wildland Urban Interface Grant Program
Congress has provided increased funding assistance to states through
the USDA Forest Service State and Private Forestry programs since
2001. The focus of much of this additional funding
was mitigating risk in Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) areas. In
the West, the State Fire Assistance (SFA) funding is available
and awarded through a competitive process with emphasis on hazard
fuel reduction, information and education, and community and homeowner
action. This portion of the National Fire Plan was developed
to assist interface communities manage the unique hazards they
find around them. Long-term solutions to interface challenges
require informing and educating people who live in these areas
about what they and their local organizations can do to mitigate
these hazards.
The 10-Year Comprehensive Strategy focuses on assisting people
and communities in the WUI to moderate the threat of catastrophic
fire through the four National Fire Plan goals of improving prevention
and suppression, reducing hazardous fuels, restoring fire-adapted
ecosystems, and promoting community assistance.
Grant Criteria:
1) Reduce Hazardous Fuels / Restore Fire-adapted
Ecosystems:
Recipients may facilitate and implement mitigating fuel treatments
in or adjacent to identified fire prone communities to reduce
the threat of wildfire to communities. Fuel reduction projects
and vegetation treatments have been identified as a means of mitigating
wildfire hazards. These are projects that remove or modify
fuels in and/or adjacent to WUI development. Effective fuels
mitigation treatments can be implemented across jurisdictional
boundaries, on adjoining private lands, or within the respective
communities. Projects of this type include fuel breaks, thinning,
pruning, landscape modifications, etc. The overall purpose
is to modify or break up the fuels in such a way as to lessen catastrophic
fire and its threat to public and firefighter safety and damage
to property. Another way to prevent future large, catastrophic
wildfires from threatening communities is by carrying out appropriate
treatments (such as prescribed burning or thinning) to restore
and rehabilitate forest and grassland health in and adjacent to
the WUI. Such treatments have reduced the severity of wildfires,
and may have additional desirable outcomes, such as providing sustainable
environmental, social and economic benefits. Project proposals
should consider all elements required to implement treatments
on the ground, which includes acquiring the necessary permits
and consultations needed to complete plans and assessments.
Examples of projects that qualify (not all inclusive):
- Defensible space around homes and structures
- Shaded fuel breaks
- Fuels reduction beyond defensible space
- Removal of slash including piling and burning; mulching;
grinding; etc.
- Prescribed fire
- Thinning
2) Improve Prevention/Education in the Interface:
Recipients can provide leadership to coordinate, develop, and
distribute wildland urban interface education programs in association
with insurance companies, communities, local government agencies,
and other partners. Informational and educational projects
must target mitigation of risk and prevention of loss. Projects
should lead to the use or establishment of one or more fire program
elements such as fire safety codes, implementation of Firewise
safety practices, establishing local fire safe councils, fuels
treatments within fire prone communities, or community planning
to define fire safe actions suited to the local ecosystem.
Examples of projects that qualify (not all inclusive):
- Firewise or similar programs
- Living with Fire newspaper inserts
- Fire education components to Project Learning Tree
- Pamphlets, brochures, handouts
3) Planning:
Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPP’s) are created
by local communities and may address issues such as wildfire
response, hazard mitigation, community preparedness, structure
protection, or a combination of the above. The process
of developing these plans can help a community clarify and refine
its priorities for the protection of life, property, and critical
infrastructure in the wildland-urban interface. The Healthy
Forest Restoration Act (HFRA) minimum requirements for a CWPP
are: 1) Collaboration
(must be developed with community members, local and state government
representatives in collaboration with federal agencies and other
interested stakeholders, 2) Prioritized Fuel Reduction
(plan must identify and prioritize areas for hazardous fuel reduction
treatments and recommend the types and methods of treatment),
and 3) Treatment of Structural Ignitability (must recommend measures
that homeowners and communities can take to reduce the ignitability
of structures throughout the area addressed in the plan). A
copy of the CWPP Handbook can be found at http://www.safnet.org/policyandpress/cwpphandbook.pdf
Examples of projects that qualify (not all inclusive):Creation
of CWPP/or equivalent document
- Priority projects listed in existing CWPPs covering the
above criteria
4) Examples of Projects that DO NOT Qualify (not
all inclusive):
- Preparedness and suppression capacity building; such as purchase
of fire department equipment (try VFA, RFA, DHS and FEMA grant
programs)
- Small business start-up funding
- Research and development projects (try Economic Action Program)
- GIS and database systems
- Infrastructure (building remodel, bridges, road maintenance/infrastructure,
water development)
Grant Considerations:
- Meets the grant criteria.
- Meets the 50/50 match requirement*.
- Each grant request will be limited to a maximum of $300,000.
- No state will receive more than 15% of the funds available
in the west.
- At least 25% of all available grant funds must be awarded to
new projects.
- All grants will be scored based on the following:
Meets the
grant criteria* |
Yes = Eligible
for scoring |
No = Ineligible |
Meets the
50/50 match requirement** |
Yes = Eligible
for scoring |
No = Ineligible |
1 |
Is this
project achievable? (time, goals, budget, etc.) |
Yes
clearly = 2 |
Yes
but needs more info/inaccurate budget/etc. = 1 |
No
= 0 |
2 |
Is this
project measurable? (# of acres treated, # of education/outreach
programs, etc.) |
Clearly defined
outputs = 2 |
Mentioned
but no clear #s/measurables = 1 |
Not
measurable = 0 |
3 |
Is the
applicant clearly showing collaborative elements and
partners? (confidence level) |
a |
Collaborators
input is clearly defined = 2 |
Collaborators
listed but roles not defined = 1 |
Not
there = 0 |
b |
Is this a landscape
scale project (adjacent to treatments on other jurisdictions)? |
Yes
= 1 |
No = 0 |
4 |
Is this
project implemented from an existing community plan or
is the request to develop the plan? (Note: preference
will be given to those projects that are incorporated
in a completed plan) |
Plan completed
= 2 |
Plan
in progress = 1 |
No
plan = 0 |
5 |
Is the
applicant clearly demonstrating project longevity? (Note:
preference will be given to those projects clearly showing
how it will remain effective over time) |
Clearly
Defined = 2 |
Mentioned
not defined = 1 |
None
= 0 |
*A 50/50 match. The allocated grant amount must be matched
in full by the recipient using a non-federal source. Exception: Title
III funds under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination
Act of 2000, PL 106-393 are not considered federal dollars and
may be used as match. The matching share can be soft match
(which includes training hours valued at an accepted rate, donated
labor/equipment, etc) and/or hard match (which is actual dollars
spent other than federal grant funds within the specified scope
of work.)
Application Instructions:
The application is in adobe pdf format. It is fill in enabled
in any form of Adobe Reader 5.0 or higher. If you do not
have Adobe Reader, go to http://get.adobe.com/reader/ and
download Reader 9.1.
1) All blocks are fill-in enabled and character locked. Applicants
must fit all information into the allotted character space. Applications
that have been modified for any reason will be considered ineligible
by the review committee. Any attachments or additional documents
that are not removed at the state level will not be considered
by the review committee.
- Application guidelines by box number: (All boxes must
be filled in on the application. If a box does not apply
to your project fill in that space with NA.)
- Box 1 & 2- Basic
applicant and community at risk information.
- Box 3 & 4- The totals in these
boxes will add automatically when all data is entered into the
fields. It is recommended you check all numbers add up correctly. See
description of hard vs. soft match.
- Box 5- Answer
the specific questions. Under the three Project Category
fields fill in only if they apply to your project. If,
for example, Planning is not a part of your project fill in NA.
- Box 6- The project area description
should give a brief overview of the project to point out the
hazards and clearly show the need for work in this area. If
applying for a fuels reduction project, describe the vegetation
types.
- Box 7- The scope of work should explain
exactly how the grant dollars will be spent on this project. Unlike
the overview, this will provide the specific details of the project
using measurable units where applicable. Be concise, say
exactly what will be done with grant funds not what you expect
the reviewer wants to hear. Use this block to explain any
additional budget detail.
- Box 8- Describe
the contributions each partner will make to the project by stating
the collaborating partners name and what they will be contributing
to the project such as manpower, equipment, matching funds, etc.
- Box 9- The Project
Timeline should include such things as: begin/end
dates, milestones, quarterly accomplishments, etc.
Maintenance should clearly show the who, what,
when, where and why of how this project will remain effective over
time. The four main points to be included for fuels projects
are:
- Environmental Factors: describe the maintenance requirements
unique to this project based on site characteristics
i.e., present and future vegetation occupying the site, growth
rates, returned natural fire intervals or any other environmental
factor that affects the continued maintenance of this project.
- Education: describe how key players have been trained
and educated to maintain the project and explain their understanding
of the needs and expectations of the project’s maintenance
- Commitment: clearly demonstrate a commitment by the individual/community
to maintain this project into the future, i.e. state laws, CWPP
terms, signed landowner agreements or other documents or agreements
that hold the sub-grantee accountable for project maintenance
over time
- Monitoring: describe who will be responsible for monitoring
the project, what qualifications they have if they are not obvious
(i.e. State Forestry personnel, Fire Safe Council member, Fire
Department personnel, etc.), and at what intervals they will
be checking (i.e. yearly, quarterly, etc); clearly describe timelines,
milestones, and measurables
Sustainability should clearly describe how the
project will be sustained over time.
Application Due Dates:
The standard application form for 2010 must be used. This
form should be filled out and submitted electronically to the appropriate District
Forester by their posted deadline. Contact the
applicable District Forester for their deadline information. Feel
free to contact Jane Lopez at 970-980-7877 if you need assistance
in finding out who your District Forester is.
ATTENTION:
District Foresters will prioritize the applications and
submit to the State Office no later than: 4:00 p.m., MDT on Thursday August 20, 2009. The
email address to send the applications to is: jane.lopez@colostate.edu Individuals
must submit the application to the appropriate CSFS District
Forester for prioritization, individuals may not submit directly
to the address above. The applications will then be
screened, scored and re-bundled for submission to the WFLC website
for review. When submitting prioritized applications to
Jane, please name the files by District initials and priority
number (ex. FC01, FC02, etc...).
Each District should set its own internal deadlines for its cooperators,
partners, and client’s applications so they may be reviewed
and prioritized at the District level before submission to Jane
Lopez by the deadline above.
|